Thursday, November 30, 2006

Broken Promises

"Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss."

Well, that didn't take long.

Remember when the Democrats promised to implement all of the 9/11 Commission's recommendations?

The WP's Jonathan Weisman does. Observe:

It was a solemn pledge, repeated by Democratic leaders and candidates over and over: If elected to the majority in Congress, Democrats would implement all of the recommendations of the bipartisan commission that examined the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

But with control of Congress now secured, Democratic leaders have decided for now against implementing the one measure that would affect them most directly: a wholesale reorganization of Congress to improve oversight and funding of the nation's intelligence agencies. Instead, Democratic leaders may create a panel to look at the issue and produce recommendations, according to congressional aides and lawmakers.

Because plans for implementing the commission's recommendations are still fluid, Democratic officials would not speak for the record. But aides on the House and Senate appropriations, armed services and intelligence committees confirmed this week that a reorganization of Congress would not be part of the package of homeland-security changes up for passage in the "first 100 hours" of the Democratic Congress.

"I don't think that suggestion is going anywhere," said Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.), the chairman of the Appropriations defense subcommittee and a close ally of the incoming subcommittee chairman, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.). "That is not going to be their party position."

It may seem like a minor matter, but members of the commission say Congress's failure to change itself is anything but inconsequential. In 2004, the commission urged Congress to grant the House and Senate intelligence committees the power not only to oversee the nation's intelligence agencies but also to fund them and shape intelligence policy. The intelligence committees' gains would come at the expense of the armed services committees and the appropriations panels' defense subcommittees. Powerful lawmakers on those panels would have to give up prized legislative turf.

But the commission was unequivocal about the need.

"Of all our recommendations, strengthening congressional oversight may be among the most difficult and important," the panel wrote. "So long as oversight is governed by current congressional rules and resolutions, we believe the American people will not get the security they want and need."

Now Democrats are balking, just as Republicans did before them.

Politics before the public. What a surprise!

Our esteemed members of Congress--from both sides of the aisle--prefer their own "legislative turf" to the protection of the voters whom they serve. However, the ones doing the latest Potamic Two-Step is the party that promised to change the tired business-as-usual schtick of the GOP. Didn't take long for them to disappoint, did it. And on a national security issue, no less!

What a surprise.

This egregious break of a sensitive promise reveals the true colors of the new Democratic-controlled Congress. They intend to serve the sacred cows of their Reasonable, mouth-foaming masters. If they must sacrifice their integrity--and their position in 2008--to do so, then so be it.

Beware the faction of string-pullers that refuses to take the War against Jihadists seriously. They will inevitably leave all of us vulnerable. And clearly for these servants, what could be more important than the continuation of their influence within the Capital. Priorities, people!